Accessibility Rules Format 1.0 Approval Voting Page
From MemberWiki
Voting Page for Approving Accessibility Rules Format 1.0
This wiki page contains the formal voting form that allows members to vote on whether to approve the release of the Accessibility Rules Format 1.0 Specification. These membership votes represent recommendations to the OpenAjax Alliance Steering Committee, which will review the membership voting and then subsequently decide whether to formally approve the release of the Accessibility Rules Format 1.0 Specification.
The member voting period is from April 27, 2011 to May 6, 2011 (11:59pm US-PT). If the member voting shows a consensus towards approval, then the Steering Committee will vote after the members vote.
Background
The Accessibility Working Group, in conformance with its charter, has been working on Accessibility Rules Format 1.0 for more than a year, with participation from companies with commercial products and an open source project that implement key parts of the specification. The Working Group has completed work and is submitted the Accessibility Rules Format 1.0 Specification for voting as an approved Specification of OpenAjax Alliance.
Per our formal process (see Members Agreement and Development Process), we held a Release Review phone call to allow all members to ask questions and provide feedback (see Accessibility Rules_Format 1.0 Release Review). It is now time for the full membership of OpenAjax Alliance to cast their votes on whether to approve the Accessibility Rules Format 1.0 Specification.
Voting Form
Anyone who has a login to this wiki can vote. To vote, simply choose YES, NO, or OTHER from the popup menu below, then press on the "Submit Vote" button. Note: You must press "Submit vote" for your vote to be registered.
- A YES vote represents a simple +1 vote that says you vote to approve the release of the Accessibility Rules Format 1.0 Specification.
- A NO vote indicates that you disapprove the proposal. If you vote NO, please provide supplemental comments that explain why you disapprove.
- Choose OTHER for all other cases, such as when you generally approve of the proposal, but believe changes should be made. If you vote OTHER, please provide supplemental comments that explain your point of view.
The table after the "Submit vote" button shows a list of all votes cast so far, including any votes that you have cast.
If you encounter any bugs or other problems when attempting to vote or view the voting results, please report these issues immediately to jferrai(at)us.ibm.com.
NOTE: The voting period has closed.
Votes Table
| Voter | Company | Vote | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jon Ferraiolo | IBM | YES | |
| Bertrand Le Roy | Microsoft | YES | |
| Aurelien Levy | Temesis | YES | |
| Manos Batsis | abiss | YES | |
| Samuel Santos | PresentTechnologies | YES | |
| Dylan Barrell | (unknown) | YES | |
| Richard Schwerdtfeger | IBM | YES | |
| Jon Gunderson | JonGunderson | YES | |
| David Todd | IBM | YES | |
| Ann Abbott | IBM | YES | |
| Nathan Jakubiak | Parasoft | YES | |
| Steve Repetti | RadWebTech | YES | |
| Prasanna Bale | PrasannaBale | YES | |
| Alessandro Alinone | Lightstreamer | YES | |
| Matthias Hertel | MatthiasHertel | YES |
