IDE Minutes 2007-08-02
From MemberWiki
URL: http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/IDE_Minutes_2007-08-02
Attendees this week
- Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai(at)us.ibm.com>
- Kevin Hakman <khakman(at)tibco.com>
- Phil Berkland <berkland(at)us.ibm.com> representing Eclipse ATF project
- Jeff King <jking(at)microsoft.com>
- Eddie O’Neill <ekoneil(at)bea.com>
- Lori Hylan-Cho <lorihc(at)adobe.com>
- Ted Thibodeau <tthibodeau(at)openlinksw.com>
(Ingo sent regrets - he had a meeting conflict)
Minutes
(continuing to review and finalize http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/IDE/requirements. Jon updated the document as decisions were made in the meeting.)
Kevin gives background of group and current status to new members
Discussed data bindings section of requirements
- Jeff: is binding indicator indicate type of binding, or just boolean flag?
- Jon: will a MAY bullet
- Jeff: are there any existing implementations?
- Kevin: tibco has thought about it, has xpath
Data bindings section approved
Discussed Control-specific section
- Lori: are we going to discuss what datatypes are?
- Kevin: types are discussed in previous bullets
- Jon: will address the question when writing the spec
first bullet approved
- Phil: 2nd bullet implies UI is implemented in AJAX
- discussion on what 2nd bullet means,
- Lori: need to cover author time widget display
- Jon: reworded to make more generic, and to remove AJAX implementation
2nd bullet approved
Discussed Control Icons section
- Kevin: question of size is deferred
- Jeff: will there be a specified size
- Phil: I would this item should be must
general agreement
bullet approved
Discussed Author-time events section
- Jon: this relates to previous bullets
- Kevin: list of author time events would also be useful at runtime
- Jeff: should this be grouped together with control specific user section
- Jon: will move Control specific user interfaces 1st bullet to metadata section, and will move 2nd bullet to this section
1st (which is now 2nd) bullet approved
Discuss bullet saying: There MAY be features that deal with undo/redo logic within the design tool
- Lori: this is too generic
agreement to remove this bullet
Discussed Internationalization and localization section
- no comments, section approved
Discussed Server framework integration
- Kevin: most participants have be client side oriented, so this item may be bias
- Jeff: need more concrete examples on this
