IDE Minutes 2007-08-02

From MemberWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

URL: http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/IDE_Minutes_2007-08-02

Attendees this week

  • Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai(at)us.ibm.com>
  • Kevin Hakman <khakman(at)tibco.com>
  • Phil Berkland <berkland(at)us.ibm.com> representing Eclipse ATF project
  • Jeff King <jking(at)microsoft.com>
  • Eddie O’Neill <ekoneil(at)bea.com>
  • Lori Hylan-Cho <lorihc(at)adobe.com>
  • Ted Thibodeau <tthibodeau(at)openlinksw.com>

(Ingo sent regrets - he had a meeting conflict)

Minutes

(continuing to review and finalize http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/IDE/requirements. Jon updated the document as decisions were made in the meeting.)

Kevin gives background of group and current status to new members

Discussed data bindings section of requirements

  • Jeff: is binding indicator indicate type of binding, or just boolean flag?
  • Jon: will a MAY bullet
  • Jeff: are there any existing implementations?
  • Kevin: tibco has thought about it, has xpath

Data bindings section approved

Discussed Control-specific section

  • Lori: are we going to discuss what datatypes are?
  • Kevin: types are discussed in previous bullets
  • Jon: will address the question when writing the spec

first bullet approved

  • Phil: 2nd bullet implies UI is implemented in AJAX
  • discussion on what 2nd bullet means,
  • Lori: need to cover author time widget display
  • Jon: reworded to make more generic, and to remove AJAX implementation

2nd bullet approved

Discussed Control Icons section

  • Kevin: question of size is deferred
  • Jeff: will there be a specified size
  • Phil: I would this item should be must

general agreement

bullet approved

Discussed Author-time events section

  • Jon: this relates to previous bullets
  • Kevin: list of author time events would also be useful at runtime
  • Jeff: should this be grouped together with control specific user section
  • Jon: will move Control specific user interfaces 1st bullet to metadata section, and will move 2nd bullet to this section

1st (which is now 2nd) bullet approved

Discuss bullet saying: There MAY be features that deal with undo/redo logic within the design tool

  • Lori: this is too generic

agreement to remove this bullet

Discussed Internationalization and localization section

  • no comments, section approved

Discussed Server framework integration

  • Kevin: most participants have be client side oriented, so this item may be bias
  • Jeff: need more concrete examples on this
Personal tools