Accessibility Minutes 2013 07 22
From MemberWiki
Present
- Jon Gunderson (University of Illinois)
- Mike Scott (Illinois Dept. of Human Services) (scribe)
- Nick Hoyt (University of Illinois)
- Rich Schwerdtfeger (IBM)
- Ann Abbott (IBM)
Minutes
Removed AAA rules, including 7:1 color contrast and video rules
Updated prototype Coding Practices site
http://dev.oaa-accessibility.org/
http://dev.oaa-accessibility.org/rulesets/
http://dev.oaa-accessibility.org/examples/coding_patterns/
http://dev.oaa-accessibility.org/example/5/
Rules for focus:
SC 2.4.3 (Level A) Focus has meaningful order
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#navigation-mechanisms-focus-order
If 1 or fewer focusable elements, rule doesn't apply
If no tabindex set, should it apply?
Mike: yes
Ann: yes
IITAA 13.3 Avoid changing focus unexpectedly
WCAG 2.0 3.2.1 On focus: When any component receives focus, it does not initiate a change of context (Level A)
IBM 2.1d, 2.4e, 2.4.7, 3.2a
http://www-03.ibm.com/able/guidelines/web/webnotrap.html
http://www-03.ibm.com/able/guidelines/web/webfocusorder.html
http://www-03.ibm.com/able/guidelines/web/webfocusvisible_aa.html
http://www-03.ibm.com/able/guidelines/web/webfocusmaps.html
WCAG 2.0 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap
Two rules?
1. Check order after page loads
2. Check order if/when page is changed dynamically
Or one big manual check?
Focus visible could be checked at the same time
Can one manual check test multiple rules?
Concept of "related" rules/checks -- one procedure could check all related rules
Don't want an explosion of manual checks
But rules need to be kept simple/focused
Jon will come up with some ideas for next week
2.4.4 Link Purpose (in Context)
2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only) - Level AAA
Rule checks whether link accessible name is unique
Does it map to 2.4.4 (A) or 2.4.9 -- if 2.4.9 (AAA), do we keep it?
